Tripoli Agreement Meaning

Among the mediators of the agreement were members of the four-page ministerial committee of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, headed by Ali Abdussalam Treki, representing Muammar Gaddafi, head of the host country, and the secretary general of the OIC, Amadou Karim Gaye. [4] Other members of the Quadrangle Ministerial Committee included, in addition to Treki, representatives from Saudi Arabia, Senegal and Somalia. [1] During the negotiations, Marcos noted in his diary that Misuari and Libyan diplomat Ali Treki repeatedly insisted that “all Mindanao, Sulu and Palawan be organized in one region. But they are prepared to put that to a referendum. [8] Marcos was inclined to accept, as he felt that “Palawan, the three Davaos, the two Surigaos, the two Agusans, Southern Cotabato, Bukidnon, the two Misamis, possibly Lanao del Norte, Zamboanga del Norte and others[8] did not want to be admitted to the autonomous region of Muslims. The day before the agreement was signed, negotiations were stalled and Gaddafi asked Imelda Marcos to return to Libya to speed up the talks. Imelda succeeded by telephone in persuading the Libyan head of state to accept the Philippine president`s proposal to “submit the issue of autonomy to the Philippine constitutional process”[9] for the thirteen provinces. The agreement was signed the next day. Ferdinand Marcos then implemented the agreement by creating two autonomous regions (instead of one) of ten provinces (instead of thirteen). This led to the collapse of the peace pact and the resumption of hostilities between the MNLF and Philippine government forces. [10] [11] “The Tripoli peace agreement will allow the two countries to re-establish good relations after being on the wrong track,” Said Déby. “Following the tensions that followed the Chadian rebels` attack on the town of Adré (the rally for democracy and freedom and the platform for change, unity and democracy), on 18 December 2005, the European Union sees this agreement as an important step towards restoring a climate of trust and cooperation between the two countries. The European Union calls on both sides to respect this agreement, in particular their commitment not to house the rebel forces of the other side on their respective territories.

[Citation required] In the same year, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, which had separated from the MNLF in 1977, began informal discussions with Ramos` government. However, these were not followed, and milF began to recruit and establish camps and become the dominant Muslim rebel group. Joseph Estrada`s government has called for a firm stance against it; Gloria Macapagal Arroyo tried to sign a peace agreement with him, but it was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the Philippines. [12] “We will commit to the agreement, as we are making serious efforts to make sincere efforts that will be reflected in practice in improving good neighbourly relations,” al-Bashir said. [8] The 2001 Tripoli Agreement cites the 1997 ceasefire agreement the 1976 Tripoli Agreement and the 1996 Jakarta Agreement between the Philippine government and the MNLF, as well as an OIC resolution calling on the government and MILF to “immediately end armed hostilities and continue peace talks to find a peaceful solution to the problem in Mindana.” The two heads of state agreed to restart relations and reopen consulates.